On 10/13/2011 12:22 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > Should Fedora for ARM officially support for some well known boards? I would like to see Fedora ARM installable on popular ARM boards by conventional installation mechanisms (IE, anaconda) without any additional steps necessary. > Do you think Fedora should provide the bootloader for well known boards > where the required board support is merged mainline? If the bootloader is in flash, lets use the bootloader that is provided. If the bootloader needs to come from the OS install, the OS install should provide it. As an example using today's hardware that would mean using the Trimslice's built-in uboot, but providing a uboot for the Pandaboard during install-time. This will hopefully increase Fedora ARM adoption. Assuming somebody is willing to take this maintainership role, is there any objection to the above? -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
