On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 21:59 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 00:32 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > > Also, do our hacked rpm & yum versions work for both arch versions > > currently? If not then that should be fixed as soon as possible to allow > > builders to build for both targets. Ideally it would be no more than a > > diferent mock root configuration as is done in the primary arches. > > We'll need separate armv5tel and armv7hl builders, otherwise you may > have cross-ABI dynamic linking in scriptlets during mock package > installation. This may not come up often, but since the two abi variants > will link together without error[0] (but with incorrect results), we > need to rule out the possibility. > [0] We really should fix this. I agree on all fronts - including that we should fix issues. However, I am a /strong/ believer that Koji builders *MUST* be separate at this stage. I am willing to accept extremely strong arguments otherwise, but they'd have to be of the Andrew Wiles variety. Hardware doesn't appear to be an issue at the moment, and we know of some greater capability coming to help with v7 building soon (more on that from Chris and myself later), but I would rather end up having to ask our guys to fund a few builder boards than try to get v5/v7 joint at this stage. We'll get there, but not just yet. Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
