Re: Thumb mode IT instruction requirements and -mimplicit-it assembler flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 23:18 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> Is there any drawbacks from enabling implicit IT instruction generation
> letting GAS automatically deal with this as required by Thumb mode? If
> not, should we add this to rpmrc?
> 
>   -Wa, -mimplicit-it=thumb
> 
> from what I can understand it should be quite safe. And I am even of the
> opinion that GAS is way better suited at adding these instructions than
> the average programmer as it carries redundant information which need to
> match the conditions of the instructions following after.

I see no reason not to do this; it's consistent with what the other
distros are doing, and probably should have been the default mode of
operation.

-Chris

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux