Re: [Fwd: Multiple ABI architectures (parallel installation, detection, handling)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 06:57 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> 
> > Currently, we have a hacked up RPM binary that introduces e.g.:
> > 
> > * armv7hl
> > * armv7nhl (MeeGo disagrees on this and calls it "hnl" btw)
> > * armv7thl [1]

Dennis and Panu can explain neon if anyone really cares, or I will be
online later at some point. But it's not really an issue from an ABI
point of view. The issue is hardfp vs. non-hardfp and in more general
handling within RPM for multi-ABI. I like that term, multi-ABI. I think
I'll take out a trademark ;)

Jon.


_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux