On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/06/2011 04:39 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: >> On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:34:43 -0400, William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> Would it be possible to get the new prelink rpm pulled into arm >>> builds? >>> >>> The prelink arm support (rhbz#733089) is available in: >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=260584 >> >> Can you elaborate as to why? My experience and measurements show that >> prelink does more harm than good more offten than not. I can think of a >> lot of reasons to not use it, and very few reasons to use it. > > This seems to be a general argument against prelink, not ARM-specific. > If there's any special ARM-related reason not to prelink, then it makes > sense to do something different from other Fedora arches. But if there > isn't, we should not diverge unnecessarily. I agree. Most of the discussion in this thread seems to be based upon opinion not raw facts. Alot of the prelink stuff seems to come down to certain preferences or use case. I think we should follow upstream, its not like it can't be enabled/disable on a case by case basis anyway. Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
