On 09/06/2011 06:53 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:15:45 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Personally, I would consider prelink a 'ok, we have everything working >>> now, and we want to look at making it faster' instead of enabling it >>> before everything is working or building. >> >> I agree That makes sense (although I do not think the prelink issues will be >> ARM specific and they are already resolved on other arches; I may be wrong). > > There could be ARM specific bugs. The Systemtap testsuite > (packaged as systemtap-testsuite) for example contains some > explicit checks to see whether or not you can properly observe > prelinked executables. So having the prelink package available > on ARM would at least help us all test and make sure prelink > works as intended. So please do include the package, if only > so people can do some measurements to check whether the startup > speedup is "just" 10% or even up to 50% on their machines. I agree on the dependency and testing part, but I think 10% is optimistic. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
