On 5 Aug 2011 19:15, "Gordan Bobic" <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> How does one pick the correct "ports" part of glibc for the correct core?
>
> I tried to build the RHEL6 glibc with the F13 ports tar ball, but the
> build eventually fails:
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi/4.4.5/libgcc_eh.a(unwind-arm.o):
> In function `__gnu_Unwind_Backtrace':
> (.text+0x8b8): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_guard'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Looks very much like the error in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726495
HTH,
Niels
> I'm guessing this is to do with the mismatch between
> glibc-ports-2.12-26-gcf64098.tar.xz from the F13 package
> and
> glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1-fedora.tar.bz2
> glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1.tar.bz2
> from the RHEL6 package.
>
> Where do I get glibc-ports-2.12-2 ?
> And what do the 8 characters at the end signify?
>
> Gordan
>
> On 08/05/2011 01:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:42:19 +0100, Peter Robinson
> > <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Are the patches for F13 glibc to make it work on ARM available
> > > somewhere? I noticed that F13-ARM ships with 2.12-4, but primary
> > > F13
> > > ships with 2.12-1 which was updated to 2.12.2-1. Where are the
> > > patches
> > > from 2.12-1 to 2.12-4 for ARM? I found this page:
> > >
> > >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Packages_needing_patching
> > > [2]
> > > but it only lists F12 packages, the F13 section is empty.
> > >
> > > The reason I'm asking is because I'm building RHEL6 for ARM, and
> > > glibc
> > > is one off the packages that don't build. Build fails with armv5tel
> > > not
> > > supported. I can see in the F13 spec file that the only arm
> > > specific
> > > patch applied is tzupdate2.patch, with a couple of ARM specific
> > > compile
> > > options and suchlike, I just wanted to make sure there is nothing
> > > else
> > > I'm missing.
> > >
> > > In the srpm?
> >
> > Yes, as I said, I saw the spec file in the srpm, and the only thing I
> > can see there is the tzupdate2.patch, but that doesn't explain the gap
> > between 2.12-1 and 2.12-4. My concern is that there may be ARM
> > specific
> > fixes between those versions, and primary F13 never appears to have
> > shipped with 2.12-4.
> >
> >
> > It is basically just that, possibly some changes to the spec file itself
> > as well from memory when I looked at it. diffing against mainline will
> > tell you that. The fixes for F-13 weren't accepted upstream, the ones
> > for F-14 were less bad but I think F-15 will have something that's
> > acceptable to upstream.
> >
> > Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list
> arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
