On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Likely not F-13 but its not the only part of Fedora :-) although ctyler/PaulW can comment better on their plans for F-13.
I was meaning more into rawhide/F-15/F14. Rawhide so we don't have to go through this all again, and F-15/F-14 as they are the next for ARM. EG its the perfect time to be looking to get this into F-14 as we're building it for ARM now. In coming month or so we'll be kicking of F-15 and rawhide likely both for both hardfp and softfp targets.
Most of the stuff for F-14 currently I'm having committed upstream and then pulling the fixed builds for F-14 so that would be the way to go for the 2 current and for rawhide.
Peter
On 22/06/11 21:15, Peter Robinson wrote:I'm going to push all of them upstream.
>
> Have these issues been filed as bugs?
Is it even possible to push them to Fedora? F13 is EOL. If there's
> Are there going to be fixes committed
> to mainline Fedora?
a way to get them into the F13 ARM repo I'd like to do that.
Likely not F-13 but its not the only part of Fedora :-) although ctyler/PaulW can comment better on their plans for F-13.
I was meaning more into rawhide/F-15/F14. Rawhide so we don't have to go through this all again, and F-15/F-14 as they are the next for ARM. EG its the perfect time to be looking to get this into F-14 as we're building it for ARM now. In coming month or so we'll be kicking of F-15 and rawhide likely both for both hardfp and softfp targets.
Most of the stuff for F-14 currently I'm having committed upstream and then pulling the fixed builds for F-14 so that would be the way to go for the 2 current and for rawhide.
Peter
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm