Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:12:13 -0400
Cc: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1308579365.10185.2@hogo> (message from Andrew Burgess on Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:16:05 -0700)

Nope, /proc/interrupts keeps changing.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb
  - From: Andrew Burgess

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY
Next by Date: Re: Fedora 13 ARM Beta3 Release
Previous by thread: Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb
Next by thread: Re: Does anyone care about LSB on arm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM (Vger)] [Linux ARM] [ARM Kernel] [Fedora User Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Discussion] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux