On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 14:16 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:44 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:11 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > I missed on all the fun today, but I guess I still can bring in some useful stuff. > > > Support for perl openssl gettext popt glib2 pkgconfig > > > > > > git://knox.linuxhacker.ru/~green/arm.git armv7hl-green > > > > Excellent. I'll take a look in a few minutes. I'm writing up a wiki page > > summary of Friday's activities, along with a guide for those who want to > > join in (by posting update to self named branches of armv7hl - see e.g. > > armv7hl-jcm, armv7hl-dmarlin, armv7hl-seneca on the Fedora ARM git tree > > for the rootfs-in-progress. Please post pull requests here, and copy me. > > I'll gatekeeper these pull requests so that we have merge co-ordination. > I'm wondering if the merges would be easier if the build scripts were in > a subdirectory rather than in the 'stage2' script itself -- so instead > of an extra entry in the /stage2/stage2 case structure, we'd drop a file > in /stage2/buildscripts.d (or similar). > > The part of stage2 that loops through the whole package set could > instead loop through all of the script names in that directory. (If > build order is an issue for future archs, we could use sysvinit-style > order numbers: /stage2/buildscripts.d/45-gawk). I'm for using a numbered build script approach with sysv ordering. One of us could hack this up, but since it's it's DJ's script let me copy him and give him an opportunity to figure out how he wants this done. Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
