On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:14:56 AM Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 13:29 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:54 +0200, Dan HorÃk wrote: > > >> Similar package (fake-build-provides [1], [2]) is required in koji on > > >> platforms where 32bit userspace lives with 64bit-only kernel (sparc > > >> and s390x) so I may be worth adding such package to the collection > > >> and track the changes in dist-git instead of using an ad-hocs rpms. > > > > > > Shouldn't fake-kernel be a subpackage of kernel? > > > > Certainly seems to be the obvious way to deal with it. > > That sounds reasonable and obvious, but I was thinking that wouldn't fly > with the kernel maintainers...how about we ask them (copied). It likely wont fly with the kernel folks. different arches that do not have a kernel do have need to provide it to the buildroot, We should have a fake- build-provides package in fedora scm so that its a co-ordinated effort, but we should not ship it. like we do not ship glibc32 and glibc64 arm is in an akward position where people need to provide thier own kernel. best bet right now is to work on getting some useable kernels out there. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
