Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-05-31 10:00, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> I recently ran some bonnie++ benchmarks against both an SD card and a
> USB 2.0 hard drive and I was seeing about 10 MB/sec on the USB drive.
> http://jeffbastian.blogspot.com/2011/05/storage-speed-on-pandaboard.html
>
> This was with the 2.6.35-g6d019da-dirty kernel.
>
> I'll have to try this again with the pings and see if that improves the
> performance.


I ran bonnie++ again on my PandaBoard with a USB hard drive and I also 
saw the performance double when I was pinging the system.  I'm now 
getting 18 MB/sec writes and 24 MB/sec reads.

I posted the full bonnie++ results at:
http://jeffbastian.blogspot.com/2011/06/storage-speed-on-pandaboard-revisited.html

Jeff
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux