Re: armv7hl requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> I must say that I like this idea A LOT! :D

I like this idea a lot too. It will speed up development. :)

If the -main- development is done this way, then a final compile for  
the release is done on actual hardware with the actual toolchain, it  
would also meet the specs of the Fedora Project.  This is less  
frustrating to developers, and it should only require a 1 recompile  
since the build issues should be fixed.

While adding the armv7l flags, can we also double check for the  
existence of the armv5tel flags and add them if necessary especially  
in the f15 and f16 packages? :)







_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux