Re: Building Updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 07:39 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 07:18:02 AM Chris Tyler wrote:
> > There are a few options here:
> > [A] Use koji-shadow against dist-fX-updates-candidate PA (and targeting
> > dist-fX-updates-candidate SA) and use a separate process to manage the
> > tag-shadowing between PA and SA.
> > 
> > [B] Watch dist-fX-updates PA for packages tagged in, and then build
> > those, targeted to dist-fX-updates on the SA. This saves a bunch of
> > package building on the SA side (though I'm not sure what the ratio is
> > between packages built and pushed to stable).
> > 
> > I'm leaning towards some version of [B]. Any thoughts/comments on this
> > approach?
> 
> ultimately A is the correct approach.

Why?

Doesn't this result in a number of packages being built that never see
the light of day? That seems wasteful.

-Chris

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux