Re: missing kernel rpm causing troubles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan HorÃk wrote:
> Looks like the missing kernel rpm is starting to cause troubles. I'm
> using common kernel and initramfs to provide support for the Kirkwood
> based devices like Sheevaplug or the QNAPs and thus need dracut to
> create the initramfs. And installing dracut now fails with
> 
> [root@fedora-arm ~]# LANG=C yum install dracut
> ...
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package libdrm.armv5tel 0:2.4.20-1.fc13 set to be updated
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel >= 2.6.29.1-52.fc11 for package:
> libdrm-2.4.20-1.fc13.armv5tel
> ---> Package sgpio.armv5tel 0:1.2.0.10-4.fc12 set to be updated
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: libdrm-2.4.20-1.fc13.armv5tel (fedora)
>            Requires: kernel >= 2.6.29.1-52.fc11
> 
> So the options are - prepare a real kernel rpm (even when it shouldn't
> be much useful), prepare a fake kernel package (containing Provides:
> kernel=V-R only) or something else.
> 
> And I've chosen the fake the kernel method for now, see attachments.

I can see the fake dependency method is more generic, which is a good thing.

Standard kernels and bootloaders are something that will need to be 
looked at sooner or later, though. It might be an idea to start looking 
at what standard supported options might include. The most popular ones 
I can think of are (in no particular order):

SheevaPlugs (uboot, kirkwood)
BeagleBoard/PandaBoard (uboot, OMAP)
Genesi (uboot, Freescale)

Further down the list is the Toshiba AC100, which has semi-working uboot 
support, but uboot has no keyboard support for nvec attached keyboards, 
and it is Tegra2 based. The current way of booting them involves 
packaging up the kernel and initrd into a bootable partition image.

The only other platforms I can think of that somebody might want to run 
Fedora on are Compulab's ATX ARM board (Marvell based), and their 
TrimSlice micro desktop machine based on the Tegra2. Haven't used either 
of them yet, so don't know where they stand on uboot.

Depending on how many popular platforms I've missed, this may not be an 
unreasonable number to have custom kernels for.

Gordan
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux