On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:05 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote: > It also sounds ill advised to be burning things that are supposed to get > updated relatively frequently (kernels DO get updated) to > non-replaceable flash. Keeping the kernel with the rest of the distro on > the easily removable/replaceable flash media is probably a more > reasonable long-term solution. Using built in flash is fine for embedded > appliances that only see 1-2 updates/year, but not necessarily for > bleeding edge desktop distributions like Fedora. Well, there's a huge difference between putting / on NAND and the kernel on NAND. Assuming just a 10,000-write-cycle durability, updating the kernel every 3-4 days (100x/year) gives you 100 years of life. -Chris _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
