Andy Green wrote: > On 01/07/11 10:02, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > >> That doesn't sound too promising. My motivation to debug code of that >> nature is rapidly fading, not least because it turns out that the reason >> I needed dietlibc has disappeared - it turns out util-vserver package >> that I need it for will happily build against the standard full-fat libc. > > Sounds like you found a solution ^^ It's a solution for me, but from tthe philosophical point of view, there is probably the greater issue of the distribution to consider. Is dietlibc really that useful on a non-embedded distribution (yes, I know I'm referring to the ARM port of something as non-embedded)? What really concerns me is that it doesn't build on x86 either, at which point I can't but question what the point of having it in the current state is at all. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
