Re: ARMv7 rootfs/repository?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Andrew Burgess <aab@xxxxxxxxxxx>:


> i assume the arm5 instruction set is upward compatible so it would
> seem even easier than an existing x86_64 kernel running 32bit code
> which is not binary compatible.
>
> are you sure the fp arg style is a kernel issue?
> are there system calls that take floats (not in structs or arrays
> but as a single argument)?
>
> i could be totally wrong. it just seems almost there...

What you are saying is that it should work more akin to the i386, i586  
scenario. Where you recompiled the kernel for your arch (i586) and all  
the i386 packages just worked. But you got the speed bump from the  
kernel from the recompile. Then you recompiled everything you used  
heavily as i586 (if it would compile).

What they are saying is this doesnt work because of the ABI.

I vaguely recall (and maybe incorrectly) the original fpu emulation in  
the linux kernel (ie .99) had this issue too. Im thinking both glibc  
and the kernel emulation had to be fixed before this worked correctly.

You can always try it. :P


_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux