On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 11:14 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hardfp would break compatibility with all of the existing binary > > packages, and hardfp can't be compiled by gcc for any of the CPUs I have > > got my hands on so far. They key point here, as I sort this out, is that *the gcc we currently have in Fedora* does not support hardfp on vfp-equipped CPUs. > It would seem that its a definite second repository like i686/x86-64 > but it also seems that there's patches pending for gcc 4.5.1 so it > might a F-15 target unless we can get an updated gcc for F-14 but the > BeagleBoard and n900 should both support some version of hardfp Agreed, this really is boiling down to the question: (a) Do we use a different compiler than is currently included in Fedora, or (b) Do we wait until a version of gcc that supports hardfp on vfp is available in Fedora (4.5.x, likely in the F15 timeframe). I don't want to wait for (b) but I think it's a better option than (a). -Chris _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
