On Sunday 14 February 2010 21:12:03 Matthew Wilson wrote: > On 14 February 2010 15:26, Stefano Cavallari <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have an IGEPv2 board too, and Fedora 12 seems to run well. > > I'm using a prebuilt kernel which I "stole" from the NAND, and the rootfs > > from Fedora wiki. > > I'd like to run a native kernel though. > > I'm not sure which is better. The linux-omap branch (from which ISEE > take their kernel) has lots more support for the OMAP hw. But, yes, > I'd rather see something closer to mainline if possible. > Maybe we can just apply relevant fedora patches to the omap branch. The important thing (IMHO) is to keep up with security updates and have a kernel config similar with the one of Fedora. > I think the issue is getting a stable set of patches against the > Fedora kernel for each supported board. I tried rebasing some of the > ISEE changes against a 2.6.32 but failed to get something meaningful. > > Perhaps we could chat off-list and work out a good set of patches for the > IGEP? Good idea, I sent you a mail with my contacts. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
