On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 11:25 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:43:52PM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
>
> > #include_next is not understood by the compiler, and hence it gives up.
> >
> > (I don't understand why this is not seen in x86 builds, comments?)
>
> Probably because the binary package in the archive was built with
> some older gcc version, or something like that. Try rebuilding the
> package on x86 on a fully updated root fs and see if it still happens?
>
>
> > %prep
> > %setup -q
> > %patch0 -p1 -b .aconf262
> > +%ifarch %{arm}
> > +%patch1 -p1 -b .include-next-fix
> > +%endif
>
> Don't make patches dependent on the build environment (I think there
> is a rule forbidding doing what you're doing here).
The patch has appeared upstream at the libidn project (31 Aug 2007):
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libidn.git;a=commitdiff;h=12f2443a37b9e6c95022e503f7853bd02110865e;hp=d39d8bd1e12c81a0795ad6f55ceb930a8f7662c2
It seems the Fedora libidn has been using version 0.6.14, while upstream
has moved to version 1.0, about 16 months ago.
Kedar.
_______________________________________________
fedora-arm mailing list
fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
