On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 10:58 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:21:42PM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/libprelude.spec b/libprelude.spec
> > index c769ab7..36995c3 100644
> > --- a/libprelude.spec
> > +++ b/libprelude.spec
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> >
> > Name: libprelude
> > Version: 0.9.21.2
> > -Release: 1%{?dist}
> > +Release: 1%{?dist}.fa1
>
> This is fine for local use but shouldn't be submitted upstream.
>
>
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
> >
> > BuildRequires: gnutls-devel, python-devel, ruby, ruby-devel, lua-devel
> > BuildRequires: swig chrpath
> > -%ifnarch ppc ppc64
> > +%ifnarch ppc ppc64 %{arm}
> > BuildRequires: valgrind
> > %endif
>
> This I understand..
>
>
> > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ chmod -w %{buildroot}%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so
> > touch -r ./configure.in %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/prelude/default/*
> >
> > # PPC strips ld.so so valgrind can't run
> > -%ifnarch ppc ppc64
> > +%ifnarch ppc ppc64 %{arm}
> > %check
> > make check
> > %endif
>
> But what is that for? At least the comment explains why PPC can't run
> the testsuite, but there's no such comment for ARM. Is it the same
> reason? Or a different reason?
This is because the valgrind rpm is not yet built on ARM. I'll update
the comment in there.
Kedar.
_______________________________________________
fedora-arm mailing list
fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
