On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:59:05PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > So as long as the compiler is doing the right thing and the RPM > > macros are setup to properly list the gnu style arch, I think this is a > > better answer. It's a lot more obvious as to what is being attempted > > then embedding the 'v'. > > That's generally how features are encoded on ARM, though. Like how > 'ARMv5, Thumb, Extended DSP instructions' is encoded as 'armv5te' and > not as 'armv5_thumb_edsp'. > > Right now, the rpm arch name for ARMv5TE little-endian is is > 'armv5tel', and it would be kind of weird to have the Thumb and EDSP > capabilities encoded as single letters but to have VFP encoded as > _vfp in the same arch name. [ replying to self ] On the other hand, VFP is not a core CPU feature (and doesn't get encoded in the arch name), so this is a bit of a non-argument. _______________________________________________ fedora-arm mailing list fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
