Re: Request for Comments: Better installed-systems data would really help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd like to talk about adding an randomized, rotating UUID to DNF and
> rpm-ostree updates which we could use to better count installed
> systems. The IP-based counting we currently use is deeply flawed, and
> we'd really benefit from getting more accurate numbers.
>
> This would
>
>  * let us make better strategic decisions based on our actual base of
>    installed systems, and
>
>  * help us demostrate growth and impact to various sponsors.
>
> To be completely candid: this would be incredibly useful as I advocate
> for Fedora within Red Hat, but no one @redhat has directed me to ask
> for it. And its *not* just Red Hat — this would be useful in talking to
> our various hardware partners too and other potential sponsors.
>
> Long ago, we had Smolt, but this was opt-in and didn't present a very
> complete picture. I'd like to propose we do something similar to what
> openSUSE describes here: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Statistics.
> That is: A completely random UUID used only for this purpose, and used
> for counting rather than tracking.
>
> We could refresh the UUID periodically (like monthly) to ensure that
> long-term tracking wouldn't even be an option (while still
> distinguishing between short-lived cloud or test instances). And of
> course there would be some way to opt out.
>
> Recently Canonical has implemented a much greater amount of data
> collection
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040139.html,
> and while maybe we might want to look at reviving an opt-in system, I
> don't think we need that right now. (Historically, we've had a lot of
> resistance to similar proposals as opt-out, and the value of opt-in is
> low.)
>
> Basically, all I want is that UUID plus CPU arch plus ID, VERSION_ID,
> and VARIANT_ID from /etc/os-release. (And, I'd also like to start using
> VARIANT_ID for labs, spins, docker images, etc.)
>
> What do you think? Does the suggested plan make sense?

Yes.  I think we should go forward with this.

josh
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux