Re: [council] #71: IRC SIG reform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/29/2016 08:54 AM, council wrote:
> #71: IRC SIG reform
> ---------------------+---------------------
>  Reporter:  be0      |       Owner:
>    Status:  new      |    Priority:  normal
> Component:  General  |  Resolution:
>  Keywords:           |
> ---------------------+---------------------
> 
> Comment (by mattdm):
> 
>  I'll try to make some time to hang out in the channel next week. I do
>  appreciate the effort that this takes.

I've been hanging out on the channel off and on for the last couple
weeks.   I have yet to see a problem personally.  I think that the
issues around the channel are being exaggerated; I suspect that we're
really talking about one bad op, and that's it.

IMHO, Fedora *should* have a formal process for adding and removing OPs
with regular rotation, and for complaints about the channel, especially
CoC violations.  But I don't personally see a reason to throw out all of
the existing Ops.


-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux