On 09/28/2016 05:00 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > This is one of the reasons we didn't want significant overlap in the > targets for the different editions. However, if we get into *spins* > (where overlap is fair game!) approving external repos, I can see the > potential for a mess developing. > > > Yes; I realized this when searching for examples of this sort of problem. So > it's probably not actually a problem for the current set of editions, given the > lack of overlap. > > I'm not sure if the spins should have the power to approve external repositories > on their own if they are not present in any other edition, but I do feel like I > should be able to get relatively easy access to the same set of third party > repositories I would on Fedora Workstation as I would running a desktop spin. I > suppose when I talk about "distribution wide" approval of third party > repositories this is really the sort of thing I'm thinking about. > FESCo decided that adding a repo to anything other than an Edition would have to be approved by FESCo, who operates as the authority for distribution-wide approvals.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
