On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2 September 2016 at 17:34, Robert Mayr <robyduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2016-09-02 20:51 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> > Hi everyone! Last week I canceled because I hadn't planned an agenda in >>> > advance. Let's see what we have on our plate right now... what items >>> > should be on Monday's agenda? >>> >>> Things I have: >>> >>> - Upcoming FY18 budget submission >>> - Mockups for non-free third-party software >>> - PRD review discussion (we don't have any updated PRDs, and didn't >>> require them to be due yet, but I want to make sure we don't lose >>> this) > >> State and future of FLOCK bids? I know it is early, but at least put >> together in which direction we are going to go for next year? >> > > I think that should go with FY18 budget submissions as it will help > any bidders to know what ball park they have to work on. [From 2 boxes > behind the Trump Taj Mahal to Disneyworld in August.] I think it needs a separate topic. There have been discussions around the purpose of Flock, where we want to take it, and how can we do that. Not just "how much can we afford." josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
