#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: workstation | -------------------------+--------------------- Comment (by aday): Replying to [comment:30 jwboyer]: > > "However, the availability of non-free software options can be advertised prior to its enablement, provided that specific details about that software are not displayed." > > I actually think that additional clause is counter to what Matt is aiming for. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding. Why would we advertise e.g. Chrome as available but having no details without the user explicitly opting in to non-free software? That suggestion was my attempt to rephrase Matt's original proposal, so maybe there was a misunderstanding along the way (or maybe I'm just not communicating well). The idea, I thought, was to indicate that non-free software is available in a generic way, without giving details about the individual non--free apps (imagine something like "enable non-free software to see more"). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:32> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
