#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: workstation | -------------------------+--------------------- Comment (by jwboyer): Replying to [comment:27 mattdm]: > Also: I think we're mostly discussing nuances of what I called "the second part". Aside from possible clarifications of phrasing, are all Council members okay with "part 1"? That is, something like: > > > The Fedora Council supports a third-party software policy that conforms to Fedora's definition of free and open source software. The policy must require a distinction between Fedora-provided and third-party software that is clear to novice users. The selection and curation process for third-party software must be community-based and transparent. > > ? > > Is anyone ''opposed'' to this? I'm fine with this part of the proposal. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:29> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
