#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: workstation | -------------------------+--------------------- Comment (by mattdm): Replying to [comment:14 rhughes]: > Could someone (mattdm?) test the gnome-software in rawhide (3.21.4) and tell me if what I've implemented is "good enough" for this ticket? In the case where the .repo file is installed but not enabled we still show the dialog to enable the nonfree source just before starting the install action. Thanks. So, I installed that and dropped in Google's chrome repo file, but I don't see Chrome showing up in search -- do you have a test-case? I see various software has "third-party" tags, which is weird, because this system has no non-Fedora software. It's labeled Midori as third- party, for example. That seems more like a bug than a policy problem. I don't see any way to as a user to filter by tags, though. I know we're way into the implementation details that Alan wants me to stay away from, but the blue boxes with information describing what the tags mean seem fine to me in placement (although the text could use expansion), at least for within the display of individual applications. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:20> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
