On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 28/04/16 10:02, Matthew Miller wrote: >> Bikeshedding on the name welcome, but here's the concept: >> >> Right now, we have the main Fedora brand, which as the guidelines stand >> generally applies to the main Fedora operating system distribution and >> to our core activities. And we have the Fedora Remix brand, which is >> very clearly for work _outside_ of Fedora Proper. >> >> I think we might benefit from having an official branding for >> initiatives somewhere in between — work done *in* the project, but not >> necessarily yet accepted into our "mainline". This would encourage >> innovation _within_ Fedora without causing confusion over whether >> something is "official". >> >> What do you think? >> >> > Would that give initiatives a home, which are currently not really > allowed in Fedora, like (just to name a few) My personal take on your examples below. > - pidora This one is probably not a good example. It's too large to leverage the resources we have (it's an entirely separate arch) and it depends on code that is not upstream. > - packaging initiatives, with stuff e.g in copr or which are not > currently accepted in fedora repositories? Possibly? The standard issues around the ever present codec situations would still apply, so it won't solve that. It could be useful for other things. > - building a robot and providing software for it based on fedora (I > mean, including everything, not only the software packages, but also > building instructions etc: this clearly outside of being software Neat! josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
