#40: Enforcing the code of conduct ----------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: duffy | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: Legal | Resolution: Keywords: coc, code of conduct | ----------------------------------+--------------------- Comment (by robyduck): My thought here is to define, enforcing the CoC, clearly what happens for anti-social behavior etc., but we cannot let it up to event owners to decide beyond the single event. So Rex's proposal to just drop the "(and future Fedora events)" sounds reasonable to me, because the event owner should be able to deny access to "his" event, but not to future events.[[br]] Probably we could add another sentence that in case of violation of CoC, regardless of what the owner of an event decided, the Council will discuss further actions if justified. This can go from denial of travel aid to time-based rejection of registration/speaker proposals or anything else. What I don't like to see in an open community, as Fedora, is to have too many rules and judges for everything. People should be able to know how to behave, but this is valid also the other way around. All contributors and owners, which have very different cultures and feelings about what exactly could be against the CoC, should behave accepting and eventually discussing any opinion without the need to go beyond the red line of our CoC. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/40#comment:8> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
