On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 07:01:36AM +0700, S.Kemter wrote: > > And, I think *some* FADs make sense from the central community budget > > (whether we call that the Council budget or something else), while > > others — like the ambassadors' planning FADs — make sense to me to be > > part of the regional budgets directly. > then they will not happen, they eat easily a third of the regional budget. > But there is still need for them. Well, they have to be paid for _somehow_. I'm suggesting that it makes sense to move that line item from the general pool to the regional pool. Are you saying that if that happened, the regions would prefer to spend that money in a different way and wouldn't do the planning meetings? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
