It used to be like that last year, budged for FUDCON and Ambassadors was combine at least for latam. -----Mensaje original----- De: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-to: Discussions with the Fedora Council and community <council- discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Para: Discussions with the Fedora Council and community <council-discus s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Asunto: Re: Followups from Council phone call monday — Budget discussion for this year and beyond Fecha: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:58:06 -0500 On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:33:10PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > I'm sorry for the late response, but I'd like to set something > straight: > 2015-10-13 23:12 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > - Right now, all money is allocated to ambassadors through > > regions, > > including Flock and FUDCons, and except for FADs. > AFAIK this is not correct. The ambassadors only manage the regional > support but not premiere events budget. Well, Ruth told me that she allocated the money in that way. That may be separate from who _manages_ it. > Traditionally, the Fedora budget consisted of three parts: > 1. premiere events > 2. regional support > 3. discretionary funds > 1 and 3 are managed by the "budget owners", that means OSAS. > > 1 not only includes FLOCKs and FUDCons but also FADs as they are > premiere events, too. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Premier_Fedora_Events So, from that page, the label "premier" basically means "an event all about Fedora, run by Fedora". As structured, that means central organization for those, and ambassadors for Fedora presence at non-Fedora events. I'm in favor of a wider scope for Ambassadors, to also include regional premier events (at least to some degree — doesn't mean that we'd throw out assistance from other parts of the project or OSAS). That would include FADs focused on specific regions (like the ambassador planning FADs or a translation sprint), and possibly FUDCon too (but not Flock). > > We want to do > > that differently for FY18 — probably split out at least > > Flock, > > and have non-regional budget for marketing and other > > centralized > > community activities. > Right, and that's exactly what we already have or at least what we > used to have before OSAS, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Accounting and > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_Architecture_expenses > Please let me know is something has changed and I'm mistaken. I think those pages are woefully out of date. I think it most matches the statement "what we used to have before OSAS". _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
