Re: [council] #38: Dopr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#38: Dopr
------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  msuchy      |       Owner:
   Status:  new         |    Priority:  normal
Component:  Trademarks  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting     |
------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by ncoghlan):

 Passing along a suggestion I made internally: would it make a difference
 to the discussions if these images were uploaded to DockerHub under a
 "COPR" or "SCLo" account, rather than the current Fedora account?

 The key UX benefit of DOPR is to enable anyone with an existing FAS
 account to publish images on DockerHub as easily as they can publish new
 repos in COPR. A disjointed "make this thing over here under one account,
 download it, and then upload it somewhere else using a different set of
 credentials with no shared discoverability" doesn't even come close to
 achieving the desired outcome.

 Given that the key goal is "publish to DockerHub using your FAS
 credentials", the "FedoraPeople" branding may also be appropriate, since
 the content restrictions on built images would be similar to those imposed
 on people.fedoraproject.org:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/38#comment:20>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux