Re: [council] #25: Council Update at Flock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:32 PM, council <trac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> #25: Council Update at Flock
> ---------------------+-----------------------
>  Reporter:  jwboyer  |       Owner:
>    Status:  closed   |    Priority:  minor
> Component:  General  |  Resolution:  approved
>  Keywords:           |
> ---------------------+-----------------------
>
> Comment (by jwboyer):
>
>  How did people feel this session went?
>
>  Personally, I think it could have gone better.  I think 2 hours was too
>  much time and we (read me) should have started with somewhat of a planned
>  agenda.  Eventually it worked itself out, but maybe we winged it a bit too
>  much.

As a non council member I found it quite useful with some interesting
discussions. There's pros and cons for planned agendas in that they
cover things you want but also might only cover those and not answer
questions people are interested in.

Peter
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux