Re: [council] #38: Dopr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#38: Dopr
------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  msuchy      |       Owner:
   Status:  new         |    Priority:  normal
Component:  Trademarks  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting     |
------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by mattdm):

 * keywords:   => meeting


Comment:

 Some quick thoughts...

 Since the resulting images can contain software which doesn't come from
 the official repositories, the secondary mark — Fedora Remix — might be
 appropriate. But that has some logistical concerns as well (like, the need
 to remove Fedora logos). Maybe we need to be providing a Fedora Remix Base
 docker image, with the generic files already in place. (That could itself
 be a layered image.)

 I guess if this is made from the official Fedora base image with the Copr
 packages layered on top, this might fall under
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines?rd=Legal/TrademarkGuidelines#Unmodified_Fedora_software.2C_with_other_content_separately_on_same_physical_medium
 Unmodified Fedora software, with other content separately on same physical
 medium], although I'm not sure how the provisions there could reasonably
 followed.

 I think we do need to talk with Legal about this.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/38#comment:2>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux