On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:59:46PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> What does the rest of the Council (and others) think of this idea? We >> might need to go a bit longer than an hour, but hopefully it would >> give us a better picture to work from. > > Sounds good to me. With the schedule I posted the other week, we have > these "update" meetings monthly, and I asked QA if they'd do next > month's. So, on that nominally-now-regular calendar, that'd put the > next such slot on July 7th. Would that be a good time for this? It > seems a little far off. Let's tentatively plan for July 7th. > We're not _limited_ to that, though; we also have "Open Floor" > alternating weeks, and I'm completely fine with making that "Open Floor > unless we have something else scheduled". (In fact, next week will be > Stephen reporting on Editions.) So, that would make June 1st or 15th > open, if earlier is preferred. June 1 is too early. I'd like to include rel-eng as one of the groups and they have a FAD planned for June 5-7. It would be good for them to have the FAD and then report on the highlights of that. Speaking of groups, here are the groups I was planning on including: Workstation, Server, Cloud, Base, Env & Stacks WGs rel-eng infrastructure FPC (if relevant) I was going to include QA as well, but as you pointed out they have their own session coming up and I think they're large enough to do that on their own. Do the rest seem like good fits, and have I left any out that would naturally fall under Engineering? josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss