On 04/27/2015 03:48 PM, Remy DeCausemaker wrote: > After much thought and input from Fedorans since I've arrived > officially, I finally present for your review a proposal on the future > of FOSCo. > > tl;dr - Narrowly define FOSCo as a decision making body to handle > budgetary requests from subprojects, and revive/revamp the Fedora > Commarch Team. Some thoughts: * I wish this were on the wiki instead of a ODT. I'm aware of the problems with the wiki, but this is something that might benefit from easy edits. * The Diversity Advisor is not a hire, AIUI, but a community position. We might want to correct that in the document. The code of conduct & diversity should probably be jointly owned/maintained by the Council and FOSCo. * FOSCo has been in discussion a while, but if my memory serves - one of the points of FOSCo was to enable/enhance collaboration & communication between the groups most engaged with outreach. That part could use more detail. I think it's partially addressed by the Comarch idea, but not quite as much as I'd hope. Should we spell out explicitly the goals for FOSCo/Comarch, and how we'll know if they succeed (or failed)? I note you addressed metrics here, which is good, but more as an output for other efforts. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
