On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:52:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > After a short while, it was determined that anything wordpress > > related was better run at an opensource friendly company which > > specialized in blogging software versus running it ourselves. If a [...] > Right, as smooge says there was once a wordpress-mu setup in > infrastructure. However, people really didn't use it much at all and it > was a pain to keep going with security updates, plugins, etc, etc. > So, we retired it and suggested people should move to wordpress.com as > they were open source and friendly and did this for a living. This makes sense to me, but contradicts what Paul said. :) Can we do everything we're doing on fedoramagazine.org that way? Not that we _have_ to do them both the same, but it kind of makes sense to consolidate. > Perhaps we should gather stakeholders and see what makes more sense > moving forward? Perhaps we could approach wordpress.com and ask them > for some N sites? Or if people are really using them and we have a > strong group of maintainers we could look at hosting them in > infrastructure again. Yeah that seems like a good approach. > Or I suppose we could just leave it with everyone > hosting their own stuff in openshift. We do happen to know some openshift experts around. :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
