On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Haïkel <hguemar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 if we want an effective leadership, we need more (and better) communication.
By definition, council is supposed to be the leadership body of the project, so
it should reach not only the contributors but also outsiders.
It also helps to get more visibility on how the council acts.
I was actually discussing this with ryan lerch a few weeks ago. General contributor stuff on a separate blog might be a great thing. However, I am not sure it should be limited to just council content. I would say, let's stand it up and make the council members editors/approvers as well as authors and seek any contributor-focused content from the community.
I would also argue that we might want to consider a "planet" (read: aggregator) for Fedora Magazine & Fedora Contributor to allow people to consume them both. Why not just use the existing planet you might ask? Because the volume of content on there is so high these two feeds might be lost.
And finally, I think ff.home (or whatever it is called) should have the option to include both feeds. ff.home has done huge things for the magazine readership, and the contributor one would be starting at 0, any bump would help a lot.
In general, +1.
Langdon
btw, I would love to see a "Fedora Council status" session at Flock,
as Fesco usually do.
And a good occasion for some Q/A with contributors.
Regards,
H.
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
