On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:33:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base, from 2009, speaks mostly > > about the previous default offering. We should update this. Stephen > > Gallagher, I know you're full of free time :) -- do you want to take > > that on as part of the Fedora.next Editions change? > > To be honest, I would delete it entirely. > > The WGs already did a lot of this for their own PRDs. If anything we > should simply references those, as one of the main points of Editions > is to target _different_ user bases so we don't argue over a single > one. In other words, just let the Edition WGs define it themselves. As one of that page's original authors, I agree. The WGs and other events have overtaken this page. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
