-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 06:15 PM, Truong Anh. Tuan wrote: > +1. Design and Marketing if two of biggest as well as most active > outreach teams beside ambassadors. However, how about other *big* > teams such as Docs, Translations? This might be a role for auxiliary members, that is, people who attend meetings to represent other sub-projects without a final vote. The communication conduit back to the sub-projects is crucial. We don't need to think about voting as a winner-vs-loser approach when using consensus voting.[1] Having sub-project representatives voice concerns, provide information, and so forth should be enough to steer the consensus. It would be be extraordinarily rare for FOSCo to reach a consensus that didn't include agreement-without-a-vote from sub-project representatives. +1 to keeping active/voting membership lower (9 is reasonable), it avoids the main block of "can't get a quorum to vote." - - Karsten [1] http://iquaid.org/2014/04/21/why-consensus-decision-making-is-better-for-open-source-projects/ - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUHhGcACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEgAACgu3CgWw8znBHyX+3G/5TQCyhe V4oAoMlfoz/i4ecHiYL5Nzuh2zK1ARkq =5Nfg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
