Re: [council] #17: Objective proposal: Fedora Flavors Phase 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#17: Objective proposal: Fedora Flavors Phase 2
------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  mattdm      |       Owner:
   Status:  new         |    Priority:  normal
Component:  Objectives  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by jwboyer):

 Did you only send that to the marketing list?  I don't recall seeing it on
 devel (where we talk about products all the time), nor on any of the
 Product WG lists.  Given that we've been saying Product everywhere for
 over a year, it seem like a pretty big oversight to not do a very wide
 announcement and then just act like people are going to magically have
 heard about this request and will naturally just use the new phrase.

 I'm not a huge fan of flavor, but I don't have anything immediately
 better.  I just think it's too nuanced (and weak) to really convey how
 these things are supposed to be decidedly different in many aspects,
 particularly when you consider they have their own governance structures
 and decision making committees.  I'll think about it and see if I can come
 up with another suggestion.  We should probably come up with a new acronym
 for PRDs as well.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/17#comment:4>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux