On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 03:02:56PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > product we labor to produce. The questions that arise are: "how active > should the board be?" and "how do we structure the board such that it > meets this need?" > My concern is that we're addressing the second question before > addressing the first. We don't know where we're going, but we know how > we're going to get there! The thread on board-discuss back in In the Flock session, we came to very quick consensus that a significantly more active board was desirable, and since we all basically agreed, we decided to move on to the next part. (That doesn't mean that that's a completely forgone conclusion, just that there was no point in us belaboring it in the room when there wasn't any opposing view represented.) We also recognized that this shared view might be partly a result of self-selection -- those who came to Flock _and_ came to a session on governance. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ board-discuss mailing list board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss
