On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:52:14PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > (presentation of proprietary web services as applications, curation of
> > the list of services, applications interacting with proprietary services
> > in general), it seems like you are really more interested in the
> > _second_ part: the selection and curation of the list. Not _necessarily_
> > whether the website code (either frontend or backend) is free / open
> > source, although you consider that an important factor.
> Be careful. You actually just lumped your items 1 and 2 together
> there. Item 1 is essentially selection. Item 2 is basically
> curation, or the process in which selected items are added to the list
> and maintained.
Um, maybe. :) Or maybe I didn't phrase the list well enough. I meant to
divide presentation from curation (_including_ selection). The word
"proprietary" in the first part is only there because I don't think we'd be
having this conversation if that weren't already there; I didn't mean for
that part to be about closed or open code / content.
That is, I think the two things you proposed in another message:
1. ask the maintainers to change the UI to highlight web services as being
web services
2. ask for an open and transparent method for including/deciding which
web services to display
map directly.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Tepid change for the somewhat better!"
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
