On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Yeah maybe my English is not good enough or I'm not looking at the right > places since it's not clear to me reading through the standard [1] or the > examples [2] that other packing format is endorsed and accepted by the lsb. > 1. > http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/swinstall.html > 2. https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/en/Book/Packaging looks like it is you; see [3] for a formal statement on reading terms used in a similar standard ... Neither of the links posted earlier by you mandate the RPM package format, although they suggest it as a sound choice -- Russ herrold [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
