On 25 March 2014 13:29, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I went from pretty excited initially to a bit disappointed that the
> The KDE SIG would like public comment and feedback on a new Fedora.next
> product proposal:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Plasma_Product
>
> mostly on the base proposal, Governance and PRD bits. Other stuff like
> Technical spec are still undergoing polish.
PRD seems to mostly be snipped from the Workstation PRD. I was hoping
for something with a more original vision I guess. So my first comment
really is meant to encourage the Fedora Plasma Product to create more
separation between itself and the Workstation Product. Two products
with a very similar vision I suspect will be a hard sell generally.
I expect that will show up in many proposals in the future because people will use what worked already. Coming up with completely new language and areas means that you are having to roll the dice and worry about playing word-chef each time. I think the best way to clarify this in product proposals will be better idea from the Board etc on what they want and what they don't want. [Which you are doing on your part, but is that a Board view or just your own... that needs to be clarified so that future product proposals know what they are trying to build.]
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
