Re: Proposal: Revision of policy surrounding 3rd party and non-free software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Once we take that step, Adam's suggestion honestly makes the most sense to
> me - a web service exists that third parties can register their repositories
> with. They'd register what format they're providing software in/for (yum
> repos, apt repos, etc.), what OSes/releases they're targeting (Fedora, RHEL,
> Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, whatever), and some metadata (keywords, icons, etc.).

I know this isn't really the right place for exploring implementation 
details, but whoever's providing that service is going to have a pretty 
thankless task in terms of dealing with alleged copyright and patent 
infringement. And unless whoever's hosting it is aggressive about patent 
stuff, we're effectively shipping something that's a checkbox away from 
giving users RPMFusion. That seems like the kind of thing that's 
potentially problematic.


-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux