Re: Proposal: Revision of policy surrounding 3rd party and non-free software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:37:38PM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:

> So we have decided to change, both in technical terms with the Fedora Next plan, but we also need to revisit
> how we practice our policies, which is what this proposal is about. And to be fair the change we are proposing here
> is not that radical, someone installing Fedora even after this policy change will still get a system using 100% free software
> out of the box.

Before discussing this any further, I think it'd be helpful for you to 
clarify why you think availability of non-free software is a significant 
factor in whether or not a user will choose to run Fedora.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux